It is true that people like to boil complex historical events down to simple sound-bites, and that such simplification can cause distortion of the facts. The relevant facts of the case of Galileo, however, remain these: Galileo posited a cosmology based on the authority of observations and mathematics, and the church took a contrary position, for whatever reason, based on the authority of its scripture. The fact that Galileo turned out to be correct remains to this day as a serious challenge to the authority cited by the church. Pointing out that the "sound-bite" version fails to account for the intricacies of the personalities and events is merely an attempt to obfuscate the truth: the church actually had NO special insight into the cosmos, and continues to have none today.
It is true that people like to boil complex historical events down to simple sound-bites, and that such simplification can cause distortion of the facts. The relevant facts of the case of Galileo, however, remain these: Galileo posited a cosmology based on the authority of observations and mathematics, and the church took a contrary position, for whatever reason, based on the authority of its scripture. The fact that Galileo turned out to be correct remains to this day as a serious challenge to the authority cited by the church. Pointing out that the "sound-bite" version fails to account for the intricacies of the personalities and events is merely an attempt to obfuscate the truth: the church actually had NO special insight into the cosmos, and continues to have none today.
ReplyDelete